Horse Meat might be on your plate soon in the USA

News, Stories

Recently, the House Appropriations Committee took a step towards permitting horse slaughter in the UNITED STATES after beating a ban on horse meat inspections by the Agriculture Division.



On Tuesday, wild horse supporters hope that the committee preserves a lawful barrier that forbids the culling of wild horses.
For a long time, United States Congress has restricted horse slaughter activities by not appropriating financial support for national horse meat inspectors. A week ago, following a striking argument that even people opposing the ban described “emotional,” the Appropriations Committee, on a 25-27 vote, were unsuccessful to prolong the ban into next year.

On Tuesday, wild horse supporters hope that the committee preserves a lawful barrier that forbids the culling of wild horses.
For a long time, United States Congress has restricted horse slaughter activities by not appropriating financial support for national horse meat inspectors. A week ago, following a striking argument that even people opposing the ban described “emotional,” the Appropriations Committee, on a 25-27 vote, were unsuccessful to prolong the ban into next year.

Supporters of stopping the ban on horse meat inspection, including Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., mentioned that more than 100,000 horses are shipped from the UNITED STATES for slaughter in Canada and Mexico yearly, and therefore an American-regulated inspection plan could end up in a more civilized way of handling these animals.

“we know unequivocally that horse slaughter is not humane and can’t be done humanely because of the unique biology of horses.”

Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., whose amendment could have restricted financial backing for an inspection plan, stated, “we know unequivocally that horse slaughter is not humane and can’t be done humanely because of the unique biology of horses.”
Roybal-Allard mentioned that 80% of the US general public is against horse slaughter but listed various other aspects to oppose an inspection plan, such as the fact that horses might be subjected to a range of harmful chemicals which can make their meat a community health risk. She stated exactly what slight economic gain horse slaughter will bring the community, it will be accompanied by contaminated water and a “bad smell.”
She mentioned previously that the USDA inspection initiatives revealed the cruel handling of horses, several of which stayed conscious while being taken apart.”
President Trump’s proposed 2018 budget for the Bureau of Land Administration reduces financial support for the wild horse administration program and suggests removing the rules that prevented BLM from selling captured wild horses to slaughterhouses.

Rep. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., stated that the majority of Us citizens consider horses “as companion animals, not as livestock.” In reaction to the point a number of horses will be slaughtered in foreign countries anyway, Bishop said, “If they’re going to be slaughtered: not in our house, not in our country.”

Rep. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., stated that the majority of Us citizens consider horses “as companion animals, not as livestock.” In reaction to the point a number of horses will be slaughtered in foreign countries anyway, Bishop said, “If they’re going to be slaughtered: not in our house, not in our country.”

Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, sought to introduce American iconography into the argument. “We built our country and fought wars on the backs of horses and they deserve better treatment than any door opening to their slaughter,” she said.
Throughout the discussion, both opponents and enthusiasts of an inspection program were mindful not to imply anybody was suggesting horse slaughter, and terms in other parts of the statement showed inclusion of inspections for the cruel handling of horses below the Animal Welfare and Horse Protection Acts.

He said he anticipates that permitting inspections could assist in creating “pressure” to solve the overpopulation issue simply because existing efforts aren’t doing the job.

Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., affirmed that no one in the room favored horse slaughter and stated that, realistically, because none exists, it can take 10 years to obtain a horse slaughter house licensed in the UNITED STATES. He said he anticipates that permitting inspections could assist in creating “pressure” to solve the overpopulation issue simply because existing efforts aren’t doing the job.
In 2014, the United States Senate briefly thought about lifting the prohibition on horse slaughter for human consumption that would have started a processing plant located in Missouri. In May this year, the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service issued a warning to a reputable gourmet restaurant in Pittsburgh for offering horse tartare — uncooked horse meat combined with vinegar chips and egg yolk — during a Quebec-themed meal. The meat originated from Alberta.

On Tuesday, the full panel can take up an inside division appropriations bill that presently forbids investing on “the death of healthy, unadopted wild horses and burros in care of the of the Bureau (of Land Management) or its contractors or for the selling of wild horses and burros that lead to their death and being processed into commercial products.”

But Suzanne Roy, director of the Davis, Calif.-based American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, said Monday that she is worried that the arrangement might be removed by a member of the committee, Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, who has recommended moving control of federally protected horses to the state.
She said that “under the new administration they feel it is their time to make the next move”.
A spokeswoman for Stewart, Daryn Frishknecht, stated that she was not aware of any such policy but will look into it.

Share This

Share this post with your friends!